Tab Application Banner
  • Users Online: 721
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Ahead of Print

Platelet rich plasma versus hyaluronic acid injection in chronic painful shoulder: Randomized blind clinical trial


1 Department of Rheumatology, Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
2 Department of Rheumatology, Rehabilitation, and Physical Medicine, Ministry of Health Assiut, Egypt
3 Department of Clinical Pathology, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt

Correspondence Address:
Eman H EL-Hakeim,
Department of Rheumatology, Rehabilitation, and Physical Medicine Assiut University, Asyut
Egypt
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/injr.injr_237_21

Background: Shoulder pain is considered a disabling problem and is a frequent reason for consultation in general practice. The prevalence of shoulder pain has been reported to range from 7% to 36% of population. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) releases cytokines, which are delivered of the injury to facilitate healing. Hyaluronic acid (HA) has a lubricant and anti-inflammatory effect. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of PRP versus HA in the treatment of chronic shoulder pain. Patients and Methods: This study was a prospective randomized trial on patients with chronic shoulder pain. Fifty patients were represented into two groups based on injected material: PRP group and HA group, assessment done before and after injections (4 weeks and 6 months) by using Visual Analog Scale (VAS), constant score (CS), and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI). Results: The study results showed that at 4 weeks after injection, the PRP group had a significantly higher Constant score in comparison to the HA group (60.91 ± 3.89 vs. 57.38 ± 6.22, P = 0.02), but no difference was at baseline and after 6 months. Furthermore, both groups had insignificant differences as regards baseline SPADI (58.77 ± 2.89 vs. 60.64 ± 3.51; P = 0.06) and 6-month follow-up after injection SPADI (55.44 ± 4.71 vs. 57.12 ± 4.40; P = 0.19), but at 4 weeks after injection, the PRP group had significantly lower SPADI in comparison to the HA group (53.52 ± 3.22 vs. 55.36 ± 2.98; P = 0.04). Conclusion: Both PRP and HA groups showed statistically significant better outcomes in VAS, CS, and SPADI during follow-up visits, but PRP was found to be superior to HA at 4-week follow-up post injection.


Print this article
Search
 Back
 
  Search Pubmed for
 
    -  EL-Hakeim EH
    -  Selim ZI
    -  Hamed Omran EA
    -  Hosney M
    -  Abd-Elkader AS
 Citation Manager
 Article Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed269    
    PDF Downloaded3    

Recommend this journal