Tab Application Banner
  • Users Online: 714
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 

 Table of Contents  
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 15  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 137-144

Statin-associated muscle disorders

1 Department of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
2 Department of Rheumatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital; Discipline of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia

Date of Submission09-Apr-2020
Date of Acceptance15-Jun-2020
Date of Web Publication18-Jan-2021

Correspondence Address:
Asst. Prof Vidya Limaye
Department Rheumatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Port Road, 5000, Adelaide, SA; University of Adelaide, North Tce, 5000, Adelaide, SA
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/injr.injr_81_20

Rights and Permissions

Statins are one of the most widely used and reputable medications worldwide, with strong evidence of mitigating cardiovascular complications and with a generally favorable safety profile. Nevertheless, statins have commonly come under scrutiny, owing to their associations with muscle disorders. Statins are known to cause a range of effects on muscles, varying from mild self-limiting symptoms to detrimental muscular necrosis. In particular, there has been emerging evidence of statin-associated necrotizing autoimmune myositis related to the presence of anti-3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR) autoantibodies. Patients often demonstrate proximal muscle weakness and hyperCKemia, and treatment guidelines are not robust owing to the rarity of the disease. Nevertheless, literature provides evidence for use of corticosteroids, and there are emerging data supporting the incorporation of immunomodulatory agents such as methotrexate, intravenous immunoglobulin, and rituximab. In performing this review, we searched databases in PubMed and EMBASE written in English and limited to the last two decades. Keywords used included “statin,” “myositis,” “autoimmune myopathy,” “anti-HMGCR,” and “necrotising.” Articles were selected by relevance to the topic, and articles pertaining to antisignal recognition particle myopathy and other forms of myositis were excluded.

Keywords: Anti-3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase, myopathy, statins

How to cite this article:
Xu A, Limaye V. Statin-associated muscle disorders. Indian J Rheumatol 2020;15:137-44

How to cite this URL:
Xu A, Limaye V. Statin-associated muscle disorders. Indian J Rheumatol [serial online] 2020 [cited 2022 Dec 10];15:137-44. Available from:

  Introduction Top

Statins have come to be recognized as one of the leading pharmaceuticals in modern medicine, with significant benefits demonstrated in the control of numerous chronic conditions. The advantages largely center around controlling the risk of cardiovascular disease, with a vast array of trials having demonstrated a reduction in the incidence of myocardial infections, strokes, and death.[1] A meta-analysis published by the Lancet in 2005 reported a 21% reduction in vascular events over a period of 5 years, and another meta-analysis in 2010 also showed that higher doses of statins produced a further 15% reduction in the incidence of vascular events.[2],[3]

Given the well-documented benefits, statins are commonly prescribed. An Australian study published in 2012 reported that 40% of patients over 65 years of age were being prescribed statins.[4] The statins currently available for clinical use in Australia, as approved by the Therapeutic Goods Administration of Australia, are atorvastatin, fluvastatin, pravastatin, rosuvastatin, and simvastatin. The primary mode of action of statins is inhibition of the enzyme 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR).[5] HMGCR catalyzes the production of mevalonate, an intermediary in the cholesterol synthesis pathway. The inhibition of cholesterol synthesis also results in increased hepatic low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor expression and reduction in serum LDL cholesterol.

There are two broad classes of statins: Class I are the statins which are derived naturally and include simvastatin and mevastatin and Class II are synthetically produced statins and include atorvastatin and rosuvastatin.

Statins are considered to be generally safe, with evidence suggesting little difference in the incidence of adverse events in patient groups taking statins compared to placebo groups.[6] In fact, a systematic review of 35 randomized control trials published in 2006 only identified a minor risk of transaminase elevation associated with statin therapy as statistically significant.[6] Despite this, widespread use of statins continues to remain contentious, with the predominant concerns related to adverse effects on skeletal muscle. Indeed, there are growing reports, suggesting that the impact and incidence of statin-associated muscle diseases are not negligible.[7]

Herein, we provide an up-to-date literature review of statin-related adverse effects on muscle, ranging from myalgia, to myonecrosis and rhabdomyolysis and also explore the newly recognized entity of statin-induced immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM).

In performing this review, we searched databases in PubMed and EMBASE written in English and limited to the last two decades. Keywords used for the search included “statin,” “myositis,” “autoimmune myopathy,” “anti-HMGCR,” and “necrotising.” Articles were selected by relevance to the topic, and articles pertaining to antisignal recognition particle myopathy and other forms of myositis were excluded.

  Etiopathogenesis Top

The pathogenic mechanisms of underlying statin-induced muscle symptoms have not been fully elucidated to date and a number of factors have been implicated. Considerable evidence suggests that deficiency of certain intermediaries in the cholesterol synthesis pathway leads to mitochondrial dysfunction, and this is implicated as a key mechanism in skeletal muscle injury [Figure 1]. Inhibition of HMGCR by statins inhibits other intermediaries in the cholesterol synthesis pathway, in particular, ubiquinone, also known as coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10). Ubiquinone is a critical component of the mitochondrial respiratory chain, necessary for generating energy within myofibers, and depletion of this leads to inhibition of mitochondrial respiratory chain complexes and oxidative damage with resultant skeletal muscle injury.[8] Rundek et al. demonstrated a 50% reduction in CoQ10 levels within 30 days of atorvastatin therapy at a dose of 80 mg daily, and another study concluded similar results with high-dose simvastatin.[9],[10],[11]
Figure 1: Proposed pathogenic mechanisms of statin-associated muscle symptoms

Click here to view

The inhibition of mevalonate and isoprenoids including farnesyl pyrophosphate and geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate has also been implicated. The reduction of these isoprenoids are hypothesized to inactivate the action of GTPases, increasing cytosolic calcium and subsequently altering cellular function, increasing apoptosis, and ultimately leading to myotoxicity.[12]

Evidence also suggests that Vitamin D deficiency may predispose to statin-induced muscle injury. A meta-analysis of seven studies conducted in 2015, with 2420 patients treated with statins, established a correlation between lower Vitamin D levels and higher incidence of statin-induced symptoms.[13] Suggested mechanisms include reduced activation of Vitamin D receptors and the preferential metabolism of Vitamin D by CYP3A4 resulting in reduced statin metabolism and increased serum levels of statins. Clarifying a role for Vitamin D in this regard is critical, as correction of deficiency may be a simple therapeutic strategy in preventing or treating statin-induced muscle damage.

  Statin Properties Top

Not all statins appear to have the same risk for developing muscle symptomatology and select statins, such as simvastatin and atorvastatin especially at higher doses have been associated with a higher incidence of symptoms.[14],[15],[16] Part of the risk has been attributed to whether the statin is more or less hydrophilic; rosuvastatin is chemically more hydrophilic and is thought to have a lower risk of penetrating muscle cells.

In addition to the relative hydrophilic properties of the individual statin, the mode of metabolism is also known to confer risk. Many statins, such as simvastatin and lovastatin (and atorvastatin to a lesser extent), are metabolized by the CYP450 3A4 cytochrome pathway. The use of concomitant medications which are metabolized by the same pathway may inhibit the metabolism of statins, thus increasing the serum statin concentration and increasing the likelihood for toxicity.[17] Such medications include cyclosporine, fibrates, macrolide antibiotics, fungal medications, antivirals, and calcium channel blockers. Grapefruit juice also contains compounds that may cause similar inhibitory effects. Rosuvastatin, fluvastatin, and pravastatin are notable exceptions and are metabolized via alternative pathways. This, however, does not preclude them from statin-induced muscle symptoms. Fluvastatin is metabolized via the CYP450 2C9 pathway and must be used with caution in conjunction with medications such as warfarin.

  Genetic Risk Factors Top

There has been an interest in identifying the risk factors associated with an increased incidence of statin-associated myalgia and myopathy. Patient characteristics, including female sex, older age, certain ethnic groups, and presence of certain neuromuscular comorbidities, have all been postulated to increase risk.[18],[19],[20] Genetic studies have, in recent years, advanced the understanding of genetic risk factors for risk.

SLCO1B1 is a gene which encodes OATP1B1 – an organic anion transporter that promotes hepatic cell uptake of drugs, including statins. Carriers of certain alleles of the gene, including the rs4149056 gene variant, have been linked with increased incidence of muscle symptoms. These links have been shown to be strong with simvastatin, especially in high doses, but have not been confirmed with other statins including rosuvastatin and atorvastatin.[21],[22],[23],[24] At this point in time, there are no clear guidelines regarding the clinical utility of identifying polymorphisms in this gene, though it could be proposed that a nonsimvastatin statin could be preferred in patients with the particular gene variant.

Preexisting genetic metabolic disease may be linked with a higher incidence of statin-associated muscle disorders. A cross-sectional study in 2006 showed higher rates of underlying metabolic disorders in patients with drug-induced myopathies compared with a control group. Out of 136 patients in the study group, 110 were tested for a number of genetic mutations, and 10% were identified to have an underlying metabolic disease, including McArdle's disease and carnitine palmitoyltransferase II deficiency.[25] This suggests that patients with statin-associated muscle disorders have a higher incidence of genetic metabolic disease and raises the possibility that statins may unmask an underlying undiagnosed metabolic disease.

  Myalgia, Myopathy, and Myonecrosis Top

Classification of statin-associated muscle symptomatology and pathology is varied, with inconsistency between definitions in the literature. The National Lipid Association of America provided clear definitions of the spectrum of phenomena, which include myalgia, myopathy, myonecrosis, rhabdomyolysis, and myositis [Figure 2].[18],[26]
Figure 2: Spectrum of statin-associated muscle disorders

Click here to view

Approximately 10%–20% of patients taking statins report myalgia, often described as muscle discomfort and ache, and likened to influenza-like symptoms.[1],[14],[27] There is usually a temporal association with the onset of these symptoms after statin use – they are often first reported approximately 1 month after treatment initiation, but can present at any time within the first few months.[14],[24],[28]

The recognition of statin-associated myalgia can be difficult due to multiple reasons. The nonspecific and subjective nature of these symptoms renders systematic recording difficult. Recognition may be confounded by the presence of preexisting medical conditions (including neuromuscular disease) and concurrent consumption of other medications that may cause similar symptoms, thus making it tricky to establish statins as the true culprit.[26] Furthermore, there is large variability in defining statin-associated myalgias and also a lack of definitive clinical markers for diagnosis.

Some patients with myalgia also experience muscle weakness, otherwise known as myopathy, with statin use. Reported muscle weakness may be subjective, as a study published in 2012 did not show any significant change in muscle strength measurements.[24] Some patients with myopathy may also have elevations in serum creatine kinase (CK) levels, implicating enhanced leakage of this enzyme from muscle into serum and reflecting muscle breakdown, or myonecrosis. The incidence of this is reported to be very low (<0.1%).[29]

For the vast majority of patients, the myalgia, myopathy, and myonecrosis are reversible with statin cessation. The mean time to resolution of symptoms after statin cessation was found to be approximately 2 months in a group of 45 patients, published in 2005.[28] A 2013 study that followed 69 patients up to 18 months after withdrawal of statin demonstrated complete resolution of symptoms in 72.5% of patients and an improvement in 13% of patients. In the same study, 75% of the patients showed an elevated CK level at the start of the study, and 20% of these patients returned to a normal CK level after 18 months.[30]

  Rhabdomyolysis Top

Rhabdomyolysis is a syndrome of more florid myonecrosis often above ten times the upper limit of normal and clinically manifests as rapid onset of weakness together with severe hyperCKemia, myoglobinuria, and acute renal failure. Severe cases can also lead to death.

Rhabdomyolysis is rare – a meta-analysis of 24 studies reported 15 cases out of 49,691 patients treated with statins over 1990–2012, equating to < 0.03% of patients.[31] The risk of developing rhabdomyolysis significantly increases with concurrent drugs that are metabolized by the cytochrome P450 pathway. The simultaneous use of cerivastatin and gemfibrozil has historically caused high rates of fatal rhabdomyolysis, leading to its withdrawal from the market approximately two decades ago.[32]

Patients with rhabdomyolysis require inpatient treatment in hospital with supportive therapy. This includes intravenous fluids, urine alkalinization, and statin cessation.[12],[33]

  Statin-associated Inflammatory Myopathy Top

Numerous case reports to date have featured cases of statin-induced inflammatory myopathies including polymyositis and dermatomyositis. An Australian study conducted in 2018 studied a group of 221 patients with histologically confirmed inflammatory myopathy and showed that patients with inflammatory myopathy had an increased likelihood of prior statin exposure (with an odds ratio of 1.6).[34] Importantly, this statistical association remained significant even when the group of patients with necrotizing myopathy were excluded from the analysis, suggesting that all subtypes of inflammatory myopathies are potentially associated with statin exposure.

  Statin-induced Immune-mediated Necrotizing Myopathy Top

In a small proportion of patients exposed to statins, progressive muscle weakness and hyperCKemia continues despite statin cessation, suggesting that immunological mechanisms are involved in sustaining the ongoing process.

Indeed, there have been emerging links between statin use and necrotizing autoimmune myopathy (NAM), which is part of a wider group of diseases known as IMNM.[35] IMNM encompasses a broad range of conditions which histologically feature dominant muscle necrosis with little or no inflammation, and may be due to a variety of causes, including but not limited to statin use, malignancy, and other autoantibodies.[36] Features that may be present on a biopsy include but are not limited to myofiber necrosis, the presence of CD4+, CD8+, and plasmacytoid dendritic cells, the upregulation of major histocompatibility complex Class I antigen, and the deposition of membrane attack complex.[37]

Much of the literature spanning the last decade has established clear links between the presence of autoantibodies and IMNM, the first of which was reported in 2010.[38] In the same study, 63% of patients who had displayed autoantibodies were also found to have been taking a statin prior to disease onset. These autoantibodies were further characterized and found to target 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR) – the pharmacological target of statins.[39] Since the publication of this research, a number of international studies have reinforced the relationship between the use of statins, the expression of autoantibodies against HMGCR, and the development of IMNM, with a study in 2019 demonstrating that 78% of patients with seropositivity of these autoantibodies also having had previous statin exposure.[40],[41],[42],[43] A body of evidence has demonstrated the presence of these autoantibodies in a number of patients presenting with IMNM. Although conclusively associated with statin-induced IMNM, our own South Australian study has in fact detected anti-HMGCR in all subtypes of inflammatory myopathies.[41] In this study, anti-HMGCR autoantibodies were detected in 19 out of 207 patients with IIM, with no difference in their prevalence between the subsets of disease. This suggests that anti-HMGCR may be associated with inflammatory muscle disease per se, and the association may extend beyond IMNM.

There have been interesting genetic links established for patients with anti-HMGCR IMNM. Most notably, a study published in 2012 demonstrated a significantly increased prevalence of a combination of antigens, namely, HLA-DR11, DQA5, and DQB7 in Caucasian patients with anti-HMGCR compared with control groups.[44] In our own Australian study, we confirmed that anti-HMGCR autoantibodies were strongly associated with HLA-DR11, with an extremely high odds ratio of 50 and P < 0.0001.[41] The role of genetic typing prior to statin prescription remains undefined at present, but as personalized medicine becomes more developed, this could certainly be a foreseeable avenue of practice.

The workup of a patient who presents with persistent muscle weakness and hyperCKemia despite statin cessation should include a muscle biopsy and serological testing for anti-HMGCR autoantibodies, which are considered disease specific.[45] Indeed, the prevalence of anti-HMGCR is negligible in the general population and similarly in patients with self-limiting statin-related adverse effects. In addition to their disease specificity, anti-HMGCR titers also correlate with disease activity and serial monitoring of titers can be useful to gauge response to treatment.[46]

In our own case series of patients with statin-induced NAM, anti-HMGCR titers became undetectable following treatment in four of seven patients, which paralleled the clinical response of disease improvement.[47] Conversely, two of the three patients with persistent anti-HMGCR had disease relapse. Temporal seronegativity of anti-HMGCR autoantibodies may signify clinical remission.

  Management Top

Management of statin-induced myalgia

The management of statin-associated myalgia, myopathy, or myonecrosis primarily involves statin cessation and monitoring for improvement of symptoms. In the vast majority of these patients, withdrawing, reducing the dose, or substituting the offending statin will lead to symptom resolution. Statins may be rechallenged at a later date if the indications for therapy remain strong.[27],[48] A large retrospective cohort study in 2013 showed favorable results of rechallenge, with over 90% of patients who had ceased statin therapy successfully tolerating a statin 12 months later.[49] Concomitant medications should be rationalized, to avoid the risk of drug interactions with agents that are metabolized via the same pathways.

There have been a number of trials investigating the role of CoQ10 supplementation in treating statin-induced muscular symptoms. A double-blind trial of 38 patients with statin-induced myalgia suggested a benefit in 40% of patients receiving CoQ10 at 100 mg per day by 1 month.[50] A meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled trials was consistent with this.[51] However, there is conflicting evidence for its benefit and larger-scale trials are needed.[52] Vitamin D supplementation for those with deficiency has also been recommended by some; however, larger trials and further study in this area are needed.

Management of statin-induced immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy

The evidence surrounding treatment for IMNM, and other forms of myositis, remains limited, with a paucity of large-scale randomized clinical trials.[53] This largely reflects the rarity of these conditions and, in turn, supports the pressing need for large-scale multinational collaborative efforts. As such, the recommendations for treatment to date have been based on small-scale, often nonrandomized trials and also clinician expertise. Although clear criteria for clinical remission do not currently exist, reduced CK levels and return of muscle strength are the primary outcomes for most clinicians. The 224th European Neuromuscular Workshop published a report in 2018 outlining some general strategies for managing this disease.[54]

Induction therapy largely centers around immunosuppression, and the first-line treatment generally involves the use of corticosteroids – whether it be oral prednisolone at a dose of 1 mg/kg/day, or pulsed intravenous methylprednisolone at a dose of 0.5–1 g/day for those with more severe symptoms or systemic disease.[55] Oral prednisolone is often prescribed at high doses for several weeks, with close monitoring of response to treatment and the development of adverse effects.[56]

Corticosteroids are often paired with a second-line immunomodulatory agent, such as methotrexate or azathioprine, if there has been an inadequate response or a relapse of symptoms. In some cases, second line agents are started from the outset with corticosteroids, or alone in lieu of corticosteroids if there are contraindications to use of corticosteroids, such as severe osteoporosis, psychiatric illness, diabetes, or if a prolonged course of treatment is expected based on disease severity. Although the literature is incomplete, patients with IMNM have shown poorer outcomes with corticosteroid monotherapy and require a second agent to be added [Table 1].[57],[58] However, as mentioned, no strict guidelines exist and there may be great variability between patients and clinicians. Each of these agents has their own safety profile and risks, with close monitoring for cytopenias and disturbances in liver function.
Table 1: Select trials exploring the efficacy of noncorticosteroid agents

Click here to view

For patients who do not respond to the above treatments, various third-line treatments, including intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), rituximab, mycophenolate, and cyclosporin, have been trialed. The evidence surrounding the use of IVIG is, at this stage, scarce but certainly appears promising. There have been a number of reports which seem to have displayed some reduction in severity of muscle symptoms and CK levels in patients who have received IVIG.[58],[59] Based on these emerging reports, the guidelines set by the European Neuromuscular International Workshop in 2018 suggested the potential of using IVIG as first-line treatment in some cases, at a dose of 2 g/kg/month, over 3–6 cycles.[54] Indeed, IVIG has been used together with corticosteroids as first-line combination therapy, or in the place of corticosteroids, in patients with statin-induced IMNM.[56],[57]

Rituximab has also shown promising results. A 2016 Australian retrospective cohort study studied a group of 20 patients with IMNM.[60] Twelve of these patients were seropositive for anti-HMGCR and had been previously exposed to a statin. Three patients required IVIG and two patients also received rituximab due to relapses in disease activity after steroid tapering. The same study also reported on two statin-naïve, anti-HMGCR seropositive patients, who both required IVIG and rituximab for control of their disease. Many other smaller scale cohort studies have also used rituximab as rescue therapy or as part of a multiagent regimen.[58] The reports published thus far do show benefit in the use of rituximab, especially in refractory disease and for the prevention of relapse.

A recent Canadian study published in 2020 following a cohort of 55 patients also demonstrated interesting findings.[61] In this paper, 14 of 55 patients who underwent induction without corticosteroids successfully achieved clinical remission, thus evading harmful corticosteroid-induced adverse effects. A large number of patients who underwent triple induction with corticosteroids, steroid-sparing agents, and IVIG also showed promising results, with 82% achieving remission. Interestingly, 100% of the group that were not induced with corticosteroids did not require maintenance steroids during remission, compared with 73% of the group that was induced with corticosteroids, suggesting that corticosteroids may not be absolutely necessary for sustained clinical remission.

The evidence for maintenance therapy is not robust. In general, corticosteroids are to be tapered as early as is practical once there is an improvement in symptoms and reduction in CK levels – this varies between patients and disease severity. Immunomodulatory treatment is generally continued and tapered slowly.[54] Patients often require multiple adjustments to therapy and occasionally bouts of rescue therapy, with partial response to treatment.[58] Relapses in disease activity may occur after the withdrawal or tapering of immunomodulatory treatment, and therefore long-term immunosuppression may be required in some cases.[40],[62],[63]

The prognosis for those with IMNM has been poor, with patients displaying ongoing hyperCKemia and positive autoantibodies even after treatment, which may imply an element of irreversibility to the condition.[59] A mere 44% of patients included in a study published in 2017 reported recovery with immunosuppression, and furthermore, many patients continued to display hyperCKemia and persistent symptoms.[63]

It is clear, despite the challenges in achieving clear treatment guidelines, that early identification and diagnosis of the condition and using combination therapy may improve outcomes and increase the chance of remission. There remains much to be known, including the dosage and duration of maintenance corticosteroid therapy, how early to introduce agents such as rituximab, and the use of IVIG whilst in remission.

  Conclusions Top

Statin-associated muscle disorders remain an area that is rapidly evolving. Despite the above review, statins remain one of the most efficacious and safest pharmaceuticals available today. With careful monitoring and early recognition of adverse effects, they may continue to be able to be used widely in medical practice. The management of statin-associated muscle disorders is patient dependent and there is still much more to be uncovered.

The rare statin-induced necrotizing autoimmune myositis is still a relatively novel syndrome that also requires ongoing research, particularly its management.

Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

  References Top

Taylor F, Huffman MD, Macedo AF, Moore TH, Burke M, Davey Smith G, et al. Statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;2013:CD004816.  Back to cited text no. 1
Baigent C, Keech A, Kearney PM, Blackwell L, Buck G, Pollicino C, et al. Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: Prospective meta-analysis of data from 90,056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins. Lancet 2005;366:1267-78.  Back to cited text no. 2
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' (CTT) Collaboration, Baigent C, Blackwell L, Emberson J, Holland LE, Reith C, et al. Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: A meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials. Lancet 2010;376:1670-81.  Back to cited text no. 3
Morgan TK, Williamson M, Pirotta M, Stewart K, Myers SP, Barnes J. A national census of medicines use: A 24-hour snapshot of Australians aged 50 years and older. Med J Aust 2012;196:50-3.  Back to cited text no. 4
Istvan ES, Deisenhofer J. Structural mechanism for statin inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase. Science 2001;292:1160-4.  Back to cited text no. 5
Kashani A, Phillips CO, Foody JM, Wang Y, Mangalmurti S, Ko DT, et al. Circulation 2006;114:2788-97.  Back to cited text no. 6
Nichols GA, Koro CE. Does statin therapy initiation increase the risk for myopathy? An observational study of 32,225 diabetic and nondiabetic patients. Clin Ther 2007;29:1761-70.  Back to cited text no. 7
Ramachandran R, Wierzbicki AS. Statins, muscle disease and mitochondria. J Clin Med 2017;6:75.  Back to cited text no. 8
Rundek T, Naini A, Sacco R, Coates K, DiMauro S. Atorvastatin decreases the coenzyme Q10 level in the blood of patients at risk for cardiovascular disease and stroke. Arch Neurol 2004;61:889-92.  Back to cited text no. 9
Päivä H, Thelen KM, van Coster R, Smet J, de Paepe B, Mattila KM, et al. High-dose statins and skeletal muscle metabolism in humans: A randomized, controlled trial. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2005;78:60-8.  Back to cited text no. 10
Banach M, Serban C, Ursoniu S, Rysz J, Muntner P, Toth PP, et al. Statin therapy and plasma coenzyme Q10 concentrations – A systematic review and meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials. Pharmacol Res 2015;99:329-36.  Back to cited text no. 11
Sakamoto K, Kimura J. Mechanism of statin-induced rhabdomyolysis. J Pharmacol Sci 2013;123:289-94.  Back to cited text no. 12
Michalska-Kasiczak M, Sahebkar A, Mikhailidis DP, Rysz J, Muntner P, Toth PP, et al. Analysis of Vitamin D levels in patients with and without statin-associated myalgia – A systematic review and meta-analysis of 7 studies with 2420 patients. Int J Cardiol 2015;178:111-6.  Back to cited text no. 13
Bruckert E, Hayem G, Dejager S, Yau C, Bégaud B. Mild to moderate muscular symptoms with high-dosage statin therapy in hyperlipidemic patients – The PRIMO study. Cardiovascular Drugs Ther 2005;19:403-14.  Back to cited text no. 14
Ito MK, Maki KC, Brinton EA, Cohen JD, Jacobson TA. Muscle symptoms in statin users, associations with cytochrome P450, and membrane transporter inhibitor use: A subanalysis of the USAGE study. J Clin Lipidol 2014;8:69-76.  Back to cited text no. 15
Silva MA, Swanson AC, Gandhi PJ, Tataronis GR. Statin-related adverse events: A meta-analysis. Clin Ther 2006;28:26-35.  Back to cited text no. 16
Bottorff MB. Statin safety and drug interactions: Clinical implications. Am J Cardiol 2006;97 8 Suppl 1:S27-31.  Back to cited text no. 17
Alfirevic A, Neely D, Armitage J, Chinoy H, Cooper RG, Laaksonen R, et al. Phenotype standardization for statin-induced myotoxicity. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2014;96:470-6.  Back to cited text no. 18
Schech S, Graham D, Staffa J, Andrade SE, La Grenade L, Burgess M, et al. Risk factors for statin-associated rhabdomyolysis. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2007;16:352-8.  Back to cited text no. 19
Chatzizisis YS, Koskinas KC, Misirli G, Vaklavas C, Hatzitolios A, Giannoglou GD. Risk factors and drug interactions predisposing to statin-induced myopathy: Implications for risk assessment, prevention and treatment. Drug Saf 2010;33:171-87.  Back to cited text no. 20
SEARCH Collaborative Group, Link E, Parish S, Armitage J, Bowman L, Heath S, et al. SLCO1B1 variants and statin-induced myopathy – A genomewide study. N Engl J Med 2008;359:789-99.  Back to cited text no. 21
Danik JS, Chasman DI, MacFadyen JG, Nyberg F, Barratt BJ, Ridker PM. Lack of association between SLCO1B1 polymorphisms and clinical myalgia following rosuvastatin therapy. Am Heart J 2013;165:1008-14.  Back to cited text no. 22
Brunham LR, Lansberg PJ, Zhang L, Miao F, Carter C, Hovingh GK, et al. Differential effect of the rs4149056 variant in SLCO1B1 on myopathy associated with simvastatin and atorvastatin. Pharmacogenomics J 2012;12:233-7.  Back to cited text no. 23
Parker BA, Capizzi JA, Grimaldi AS, Clarkson PM, Cole SM, Keadle J, et al. Effect of statins on skeletal muscle function. Circulation 2013;127:96-103.  Back to cited text no. 24
Vladutiu GD, Simmons Z, Isackson PJ, Tarnopolsky M, Peltier WL, Barboi AC, et al. Genetic risk factors associated with lipid-lowering drug-induced myopathies. Muscle Nerve 2006;34:153-62.  Back to cited text no. 25
Rosenson RS, Baker SK, Jacobson TA, Kopecky SL, Parker BA; The National Lipid Association's Muscle Safety Expert Panel. An assessment by the statin muscle safety task force: 2014 update. J Clin Lipidol 2014;8:S58-71.  Back to cited text no. 26
Stroes ES, Thompson PD, Corsini A, Vladutiu GD, Raal FJ, Ray KK, et al. Statin-associated muscle symptoms: Impact on statin therapy–European Atherosclerosis society consensus panel statement on assessment, aetiology and management. Euro Heart J 2015;36:1012-22.  Back to cited text no. 27
Hansen KE, Hildebrand JP, Ferguson EE, Stein JH. Outcomes in 45 patients with statin-associated myopathy. Arch Intern Med 2005;165:2671-6.  Back to cited text no. 28
Group, M.B.H.P.S.C. Effects of simvastatin 40 mg daily on muscle and liver adverse effects in a 5-year randomized placebo-controlled trial in 20,536 high-risk people. BMC Clin Pharmacol 2009;9:6.  Back to cited text no. 29
Armour R, Zhou L. Outcomes of statin myopathy after statin withdrawal. J Clin Neuromuscul Dis 2013;14:103-9.  Back to cited text no. 30
Ganga HV, Slim HB, Thompson PD. A systematic review of statin-induced muscle problems in clinical trials. Am Heart J 2014;168:6-15.  Back to cited text no. 31
Staffa JA, Chang J, Green L. Cerivastatin and reports of fatal rhabdomyolysis. N Engl J Med 2002;346:539-40.  Back to cited text no. 32
Bosch X, Poch E, Grau JM. Rhabdomyolysis and acute kidney injury. Science 2001;292(5519):1160-4.  Back to cited text no. 33
Caughey GE, Gabb GM, Ronson S, Ward M, Beukelman T, Hill CL, et al. Association of statin exposure with histologically confirmed idiopathic inflammatory myositis in an Australian population. JAMA Intern Med 2018;178:1224-9.  Back to cited text no. 34
Klein M, Mann H, Pleštilová L, Zámečník J, Betteridge Z, McHugh N, et al. Increasing incidence of immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy: Single-centre experience. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2015;54:2010-4.  Back to cited text no. 35
Ellis E, Ann Tan J, Lester S, Tucker G, Blumbergs P, Roberts-Thomson P, et al. Necrotizing myopathy: Clinicoserologic associations. Muscle Nerve 2012;45:189-94.  Back to cited text no. 36
Chung T, Christopher-Stine L, Paik JJ, Corse A, Mammen AL. The composition of cellular infiltrates in anti-HMG-CoA reductase-associated myopathy. Muscle Nerve 2015;52:189-95.  Back to cited text no. 37
Christopher-Stine L, Casciola-Rosen LA, Hong G, Chung T, Corse AM, Mammen AL. A novel autoantibody recognizing 200-kd and 100-kd proteins is associated with an immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy. Arthritis Rheum 2010;62:2757-66.  Back to cited text no. 38
Mammen AL, Chung T, Christopher-Stine L, Rosen P, Rosen A, Doering KR, et al. Autoantibodies against 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase in patients with statin-associated autoimmune myopathy. Arthritis Rheum 2011;63:713-21.  Back to cited text no. 39
Allenbach Y, Drouot L, Rigolet A, Charuel JL, Jouen F, Romero NB, et al. Anti-HMGCR autoantibodies in European patients with autoimmune necrotizing myopathies: Inconstant exposure to statin. Medicine (Baltimore) 2014;93:150-7.  Back to cited text no. 40
Limaye V, Bundell C, Hollingsworth P, Rojana-Udomsart A, Mastaglia F, Blumbergs P, et al. Clinical and genetic associations of autoantibodies to 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme a reductase in patients with immune-mediated myositis and necrotizing myopathy. Muscle Nerve 2015;52:196-203.  Back to cited text no. 41
Watanabe Y, Suzuki S, Nishimura H, Murata KY, Kurashige T, Ikawa M, et al. Statins and myotoxic effects associated with anti-3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase autoantibodies: An observational study in Japan. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015;94:e416.  Back to cited text no. 42
Aggarwal R, Moghadam-Kia S, Lacomis D, Malik A, Qi Z, Koontz D, et al. Anti-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (anti-HMGCR) antibody in necrotizing myopathy: Treatment outcomes, cancer risk, and role of autoantibody level. Scand J Rheumatol 2013;2013:CD004816.  Back to cited text no. 43
Mammen AL, Gaudet D, Brisson D, Christopher-Stine L, Lloyd TE, Leffell MS, et al. Increased frequency of DRB1*11:01 in anti-hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase-associated autoimmune myopathy. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2012;64:1233-7.  Back to cited text no. 44
Mammen AL, Pak K, Williams EK, Brisson D, Coresh J, Selvin E, et al. Rarity of anti-3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase antibodies in statin users, including those with self-limited musculoskeletal side effects. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2012;64:269-72.  Back to cited text no. 45
Werner JL, Christopher-Stine L, Ghazarian SR, Pak KS, Kus JE, Daya NR, et al. Antibody levels correlate with creatine kinase levels and strength in anti-3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase-associated autoimmune myopathy. Arthritis Rheum 2012;64:4087-93.  Back to cited text no. 46
Waters MJ, Limaye V. Clinico-serologic features of statin-induced necrotising autoimmune myopathy in a single-centre cohort. Clin Rheumatol 2018;37:543-7.  Back to cited text no. 47
Mampuya WM, Frid D, Rocco M, Huang J, Brennan DM, Hazen SL, et al. Treatment strategies in patients with statin intolerance: The Cleveland Clinic experience. Am Heart J 2013;166:597-603.  Back to cited text no. 48
Zhang H, Plutzky J, Skentzos S, Morrison F, Mar P, Shubina M, et al. Discontinuation of statins in routine care settings: A cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2013;158:526-34.  Back to cited text no. 49
Caso G, Kelly P, McNurlan MA, Lawson WE. Effect of coenzyme q10 on myopathic symptoms in patients treated with statins. Am J Cardiol 2007;99:1409-12.  Back to cited text no. 50
Qu H, Guo M, Chai H, Wang WT, Gao ZY, Shi DZ. Effects of Coenzyme Q10 on Statin-Induced Myopathy: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Am Heart Assoc 2018;7:e009835.  Back to cited text no. 51
Banach M, Serban C, Sahebkar A, Ursoniu S, Rysz J, Muntner P, et al. Effects of coenzyme Q10 on statin-induced myopathy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Mayo Clin Proc 2015;90:24-34.  Back to cited text no. 52
Gordon PA, Winer JB, Hoogendijk JE, Choy EH. Immunosuppressant and immunomodulatory treatment for dermatomyositis and polymyositis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;2013;2013:CD004816.CD003643.  Back to cited text no. 53
Allenbach Y, Mammen AL, Benveniste O, Stenzel W; Immune-Mediated Necrotizing Myopathies Working Group. 224th ENMC international workshop: Clinico-sero-pathological classification of immune-mediated necrotizing myopathies Zandvoort, The Netherlands, 14-16 October 2016. Neuromuscul Disord 2018;28:87-99.  Back to cited text no. 54
McGrath ER, Doughty CT, Amato AA. Autoimmune myopathies: Updates on evaluation and treatment. Neurotherapeutics 2018;15:976-94.  Back to cited text no. 55
Dimachkie MM, Barohn RJ, Amato AA. Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Neurol Clin 2014;32:595-628, vii.  Back to cited text no. 56
Kassardjian CD, Lennon VA, Alfugham NB, Mahler M, Milone M. Clinical features and treatment outcomes of necrotizing autoimmune myopathy. JAMA Neurol 2015;72:996-1003.  Back to cited text no. 57
Ramanathan S, Langguth D, Hardy TA, Garg N, Bundell C, Rojana-Udomsart A, et al. Clinical course and treatment of anti-HMGCR antibody-associated necrotizing autoimmune myopathy. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 2015;2:e96.  Back to cited text no. 58
Mammen AL, Tiniakou E. Intravenous immune globulin for statin-triggered autoimmune myopathy. N Engl J Med 2015;373:1680-2.  Back to cited text no. 59
Ashton C, Junckerstorff R, Bundell C, Hollingsworth P, Needham M. Treatment and outcomes in necrotising autoimmune myopathy: An Australian perspective. Neuromuscul Disord 2016;26:734-40.  Back to cited text no. 60
Meyer A, Troyanov Y, Drouin J, Oligny-Longpré G, Landon-Cardinal O, Hoa S, et al. Statin-induced anti-HMGCR myopathy: Successful therapeutic strategies for corticosteroid-free remission in 55 patients. Arthritis Res Ther 2020;22:5.  Back to cited text no. 61
Grable-Esposito P, Katzberg HD, Greenberg SA, Srinivasan J, Katz J, Amato AA. Immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy associated with statins. Muscle Nerve 2010;41:185-90.  Back to cited text no. 62
Tiniakou E, Pinal-Fernandez I, Lloyd TE, Albayda J, Paik J, Werner JL, et al. More severe disease and slower recovery in younger patients with anti-3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase-associated autoimmune myopathy. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2017;56:787-94.  Back to cited text no. 63


  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]

  [Table 1]


Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

  In this article
Statin Properties
Genetic Risk Factors
Myalgia, Myopath...
Statin-induced I...
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded218    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal